The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Shri Anil R. Nahata
High Court
05 Apr 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Shri Anil R. Nahata
Date of order
05 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Shri Anil R. Nahata, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1735 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Anil R. Nahata..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 5[th] April, 2011.
1.Although the Revenue has filed this appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24-02-2010 passed in Income Tax
Appeal No.1626/Mum/2007 relating to assessment year 2003-04, Counsel for the Revenue states that he is unable to point out any fault with the reasoning recorded by the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue