In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 14 Mumbai v. Shri Parasmal Nahta, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the transactions of purchase and sale of shares are genuine transactions is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 6979 of 2010.
The Commissioner of Income-tax - 14 Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
Shri Parasmal Nahta
... Respondent.
Mr D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.
Mr Satish R. Mody with Ms Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.DATE : 28[th] November,2011.
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the transactions of purchase and sale of shares are genuine transactions is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The Tribunal in paragraph - 5 of its order has recorded a finding that in the present case the assessee had purchased the shares of a Company known as M/s Mantra Online in the month of April, 2001 @ Rs.3.22 per share and sold the same on 22[nd] May, 2002 @ Rs.114/- and Rs.119/- per share respectively.
Ladda
The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the shares were purchased at the prevailing market rate and were also sold at the prevailing market rate. The above finding of the Tribunal is based on the official report and quotations from the Calcutta Stock Exchange. The Tribunal has further recorded that the sale consideration as well as the purchase amount were settled through proper channel and that the shares were transferred through the De-mat account of the assessee and the same were also sold by transferring the shares to the De-mat account of the broker. In these circumstances, the decision of the ITAT in holding that the transactions of purchase and sale of the shares were genuine cannot be faulted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.