The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Kothari Trading Corporation
High Court
24 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Kothari Trading Corporation
Date of order
24 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Kothari Trading Corporation, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.710 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14Vs.M/s. Kothari Trading Corporation----
)..Appellants
)..Respondents
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the appellants.
Mr. S.G.Dalal for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 24/1/2011.
PC
1Counsel on both sides agree that the questions raised in this Appeal are answered in favour of the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT Vs.Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals reported in 233 CTR 313. However, in the present case, the Tribunal has remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer to decide the questions in the light of the decision of the Special
Bench in the case of Topmen Exports. Since the Tribunal has remanded the matter, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal.
However, the Assessing Officer while giving effect to the order of the Tribunal shall take into consideration the decision of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals (supra). Appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.