The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S.orson Exports
High Court
29 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S.orson Exports
Date of order
29 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S.orson Exports, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.836 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14 Vs.
..Appellant.
M/s.Orson Exports..Respondent.
....
Ms. Suchitra Kamble i/b Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
29 June 2010.
By its impugned order the Tribunal has restored the matter
to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in the light of the
judgment in the case ofTopman Exports v. ITO(ITA 5769/Mum/2006 dated 11 August 2009). By the judgment delivered
today in the Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kalpataru Colours
and Chemicals (ITA(L) 2887 of 2009), the view of the Tribunal in the case of Topman has been disapproved. In the circumstances, this appeal is disposed of, on the request of learned counsel for the
Revenue and the assessee, by directing the Assessing Officer to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with law and, while passing fresh orders to have due regard to the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (supra).
Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee has submitted on the basis of the assessment order that in the present case, the turnover of the assessee is less than Rs.10 Crores. We leave open this question to be urged before the Assessing Officer on remand. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.