The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Shri. D.p.mansingka
High Court
03 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Shri. D.p.mansingka
Date of order
03 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Shri. D.p.mansingka, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay hasbeen dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3412 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1962 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
Shri. D.P.Mansingka.
..Respondent.
Mr.S.V.Wasnik for the Petitioner.
Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 3RD DECEMBER,2007.
PC :
therefore, not sufficient cause and hence, this Notice
of Motion is dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J. )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.1962 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14...Appellant.Vs.Shri. D.P.Mansingka...Respondent.Mr.S.V.Wasnik for the Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 3RD DECEMBER,2007.PC :1. As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay hasbeen dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. Refund ofCourt fee as per rules. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S. MOHITE, J. )
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.