Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14,Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14,Mumbai v. Ashwin Ramesh Mansharamani

High Court 07 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14,Mumbai v. Ashwin Ramesh Mansharamani
Date of order
07 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14,Mumbai v. Ashwin Ramesh Mansharamani, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The present appeal is directed against the judgment andorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated 26[th]March, 2004 vide which the Assessing Officer was directed toexamine the case in the light of the judgments referred, whether theAssesses would be entitled to claim exemption under se...

Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere andthe appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1122 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income tax 14,Mumbai ... Appellant Vs Ashwin Ramesh Mansharamani C/o. D.M. Haris & Co... Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao i/by M/s. Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant. Mr. R.S. Rattesar i/by M/s. D.M. Harish & Co. for the respondent. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.,& A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for theparties. The present appeal is directed against the judgment andorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated 26[th]March, 2004 vide which the Assessing Officer was directed toexamine the case in the light of the judgments referred, whether theAssesses would be entitled to claim exemption under section 54F ofthe Act and the matter has been left open on facts and law both. 2.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere andthe appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan