The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14,Mumbai v. Heard Mr.shah, The Learned Counsel For The
High Court
07 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14,Mumbai v. Heard Mr.shah, The Learned Counsel For The
Date of order
07 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14,Mumbai v. Heard Mr.shah, The Learned Counsel For The, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDENotice of Motion No.1841 of 2008In
Income Tax Appeal Lodg.No.1388 of 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14,Mumbai
Appellant
Vs.
M/s.J.M.C. BuilderRespondent
Mr.Suraj M. Shah for appellant.Mr.Pramod Kumar Parida for resp.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ.
July 7, 2008
P.C.
.Heard Mr.Shah, the learned counsel for the
the Revenue and hence this Notice of Motion for
condonation of delay.
.We have perused the affidavit in support of
appeal (142 days) has been properly explained and the
same deserves to be condoned.
.Hence the Notice of Motion is allowed in termsof prayer clause (a)..Appeal to be listed before the appropriateBench.
(D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue