The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai v. M/S.e-Cap Partners, Mumbai – 21
High Court
18 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai v. M/S.e-Cap Partners, Mumbai – 21
Date of order
18 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai v. M/S.e-Cap Partners, Mumbai – 21, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed by answering the question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3772 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.E-CAP Partners, Mumbai – 21..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 18[th] April, 2011.
1.This appeal was admitted on 16-11-2010 on the following
substantial question of law.
“Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that transactions in respect of ‘Trading in Derivatives’ are not ‘speculative transactions’ as contemplated u/s.43(5) ignoring the fact that the ‘Derivative transactions’ were excluded from the fold of ‘Speculative Transactions’ only from A.Y. 2006-07 inserted by the Finance Act 2005, which is not applicable in the case of assessee, being the relevant assessment year as 2004-05 and the said amendment is not retrospective in application ?”
2.None for the respondent, though served. The aforesaid question
is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee by the decision
of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – IV,
Mumbai V/s. Shri Bharat R. Ruia (HUF), being Income Tax Appeal No.1539 of 2010 decided on 18-04-2011.
3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed by answering the
question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.