In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai v. Sandeep Shorewala Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2010 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 15, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Sandeep Shorewala HUF
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Perused appeal. Office objections are over-ruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. The appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the learned counsel for the revenue.
2.We were taken through the order of the tribunal and discussion thereon including the findings of fact recorded by the tribunal, based on appreciation of evidence, with which no fault can be found. The view taken by the tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No substantial question of law is involved in this appeal.
3.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue