Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-15 v. New...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-15 v. New Udyog Mandir Premises Chs Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-15 v. New Udyog Mandir Premises Chs Ltd
Date of order
11 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-15 v. New Udyog Mandir Premises Chs Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 ital1924.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO. 1924 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-15 Vs. New Udyog Mandir Premises CHS Ltd. ..Appellant. .. Respondent. Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 11TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. 1.The Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the Case of Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, reported in (2010) 320 ITR 414 (Bom). 2.In view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan