In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. Mrs.roopkala Bansal, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1307 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Mrs.Roopkala Bansal
..Respondent.
Mr.K.R. Chaudhary for the appellant.Mr.S.G. Lakhani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The affidavit submitted by way of explanation pursuant to the notice issued by this Court is taken on record and accepted. Notice is discharged.
2.On the motion made by the learned counsel for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
3.The appeal being withdrawn, the Officer who is present in Court is relieved from contempt notice.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue