Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Autodivision, Mumbai

High Court 08 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Jun 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Autodivision, Mumbai, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Review Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

BDPPS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONREVIEW PETITION NO.8 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2073 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai ….. Petitioner. V/s M/s Metro Motors AutoDivision, Mumbai ….. Respondent. Mr Suresh Kumar for the Petitioner.Mr. Sairam Subramanium & Ashish Mehta i/b Khaitan & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM: V. M. KANADE & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 8[th] June, 2016 P.C.:- (In Chamber at 2.40 P.M.) No ground is made out for reviewing our order. Review Petition is dismissed. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.