The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.crystal Gyms
High Court
22 Sep 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.crystal Gyms
Date of order
22 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.crystal Gyms, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2060 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Crystal Gyms
..Appellant
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 22[nd] September 2011
1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue