In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16, Mumbai v. M/S.mahendra Brothers, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.779 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 16, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Mahendra Brothers..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.Ms.A. Vissanjee with Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 17[th] January, 2011.
1.The learned counsel for the Revenue states that the questions of
law sought to be raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Badridas Gauridu reported in 261 ITR 256.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed. No costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue