Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.sumi Gems

High Court 06 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.sumi Gems
Date of order
06 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai v. M/S.sumi Gems, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.940 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 16, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Sumi Gems..Respondent. Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant. Mr.Jayendra S. Shah for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 6 August 2010. P.C. : 1.The Revenue is in appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 20 October 2009 pertaining to assessment year 2003-2004. The Tribunal has remanded the proceedings back to the Assessing Officer holding that it is covered by the judgment in Lalsons Enterprises 89 ITD 25 and in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Shriram Honda Power Equipment & Others, 289 ITR 475 (Del.). AGK 2.The learned Counsel are agreed in stating before the Court that while deciding the issue upon remand, the Assessing Officer shall have due regard to the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Asian Star Co. Limited (Income Tax Appeal No.200 of 2009) decided on 18/19 March 2010. 3.There shall be an order in these terms. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan