In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16, Mumbai v. Shri Ashish G. Damani, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. : 1.The Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of an Appeal, which stands dismissed for non-removal of office objections in pursuance of a conditional order dated 6-5-2009.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4311 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1609 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 16, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Ashish G. Damani
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 26[th ]February, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of an Appeal, which
stands dismissed for non-removal of office objections in pursuance of a conditional
order dated 6-5-2009. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue