In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. In This Appeal By The Revenue For Assessment Year, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: PC: In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year 2007-08 following questions of law have been raised for our consideration. i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in allowing the assessee's claim that the cost indexation is available from 1...
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.424 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-16.
..Appellant.
v.
Smt. Gita A.Ravasia...Respondent.
Mr. A.R. Malhotra with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 18[th] March, 2013.
PC:
In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year
2007-08 following questions of law have been raised for our consideration.
i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case and in law the Tribunal was right in allowing the assessee's claim that the cost indexation is available from 1/4/1981 without appreciating the fact that the property was inherited by the assessee in F.Y. 2006-07?
ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal has erred in relying on the decision of this court which was not accepted by the department and the
ASN
matter is sub-judice?
2)
Since the issue arising in the proposed questions of
law is covered by the decision of this Court in the matter of CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah in Income Tax Appeal No.3378 of 2010 rendered on 11/10/20, we see no reason to entertain the proposed questions of law.
3)to costs.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.