Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. K.p...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. K.p. Sanghvi & Sons

High Court 06 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. K.p. Sanghvi & Sons, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.253 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2487 OF 2008..Appellant. The Commissioner of Income Tax-16.Vs. K.P. Sanghvi & Sons. ..Respondent. Mrs. Anuradha Mane with P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. Mrs. V.B. Patel for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY,2009. PC : 1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1351 days delay in filing the main appeal. 2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on10.12.2004 but the appeal came to be filed more thanthree years later, on 2.8.2008. The delay between theperiod 10.12.2004 and 2.8.2008 has not been properlyexplained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown doesnot amount to sufficient cause. Notice of motion is therefore dismissed. Consequently appeal dismissed. Certified copy expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.