The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Mrs. K.s. Oomerbhoy
High Court
28 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Mrs. K.s. Oomerbhoy
Date of order
28 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Mrs. K.s. Oomerbhoy, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Though we have condoned the delay, the appellant isdirected to remove the office objections, if any, withinfour weeks from today failing which appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3192 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1616 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income tax-16. ..Appellant.
Vs.
Mrs. K.S. Oomerbhoy.
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28TH JANUARY,2008.
PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 29days delay in preferring the main appeal. We haveperused the affidavit in support. Taking into accountthe facts stated in the affidavit in support, we proposeto accept the cause shown for condonation of delay.Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and the delay infiling the appeal stands condoned. Office to number theappeal and list the same for admission.2. Though we have condoned the delay, the appellant isdirected to remove the office objections, if any, withinfour weeks from today failing which appeal to stand
dismissed for non prosecution without further reference
to the court.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue