Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Shr...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Shri.b.r.mehta & Smt.t.b. Mehta

High Court 28 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Jan 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. Shri.b.r.mehta & Smt.t.b. Mehta, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3339 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1738 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income tax-16. ..Appellant. Vs. Shri.B.R.Mehta & Smt.T.B. Mehta. ..Respondent. Mr P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. Amit Shroff for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28TH JANUARY,2008. PC : period of four weeks from today. Office to number the appeal and list the same for admission. dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.