In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. Mr.jitendra Babulal Doshi, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3358 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Mr.Jitendra Babulal Doshi..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 16th September 2011
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the Revenue in the case of brother of the assessee, being Income Tax Appeal No.531 of 2009 (CIT V/s. Jayant Babulal Doshi) has been dismissed by this Court on 24[th] April 2009.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue