Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.amar Impex

High Court 05 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.amar Impex
Date of order
05 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.amar Impex, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6431 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Amar Impex..Respondent. Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mr.Paras Savla with Ms.Renu Choudhari for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 5[th] April, 2011. 1.This appeal is filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30-04-2010 passed in ITA No.2928/Mum/2007 relating to assessment year 1999-2000. During the pendency of the appeal, Revenue had filed a Miscellaneous Application No.658/Mum/2010 and by an order dated 19-01-2011, the Tribunal has recalled its earlier order. In this view of the matter, Counsel for the Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal. 2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such. Refund of court fee as per rules. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan