Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.b.s. International

High Court 06 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.b.s. International
Date of order
06 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai v. M/S.b.s. International, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1484 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 17, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.B.S. International..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 6 August, 2010. P.C. : 1.By its impugned decision the Tribunal has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for passing a fresh order. In view thereof we do not consider it necessary to entertain the Appeal. The Assessing Officer shall on remand decide the proceedings in accordance with law and shall have due regard to the judgment of this Court delivered on 29 June 2010 in the Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals [ITA (L) 2887 of 2009]. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan