Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. M/S.marigold Impex, Mumbai

High Court 06 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. M/S.marigold Impex, Mumbai
Date of order
06 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. M/S.marigold Impex, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2018 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Marigold Impex, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around finding of fact recorded by the tribunal based on appreciation of evidence. The view taken by the tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan