The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. R. Ramchandran
High Court
03 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. R. Ramchandran
Date of order
03 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17, Mumbai v. R. Ramchandran, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2980 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 17, MumbaiVersus
..Appellant.
R. Ramchandran
..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 3[rd] February, 2010
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue states that the issue which arises in the appeal is covered against the revenue by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P. Ltd., [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421 (Bom).
2.In view of the statement, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue