Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. M/S.associated Electrical Agencies

High Court 21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. M/S.associated Electrical Agencies
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. M/S.associated Electrical Agencies, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1322 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Associated Electrical Agencies..Respondent. Ms.Devki Iyer for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. In view of the findings recorded in para 6 of the order of the tribunal, deletion of penalty is justified. The observations in para 6 are as under : “6.We have considered the submissions made by both the sides, material on record and Order of the Revenue Authorities. In respect of two disallowances relating to rate of depreciation, there remains no basis for levy of penalty as the Tribunal has accepted the claim of the assessee in this regard, hence penalty levied on such disallowances is quashed. As regards the other issue, we find that all the facts relating to loss on sale of delivery vans, were before the AO and loss has been rejected in view of the difference in legal interpretation of relevant provisions, hence penalty in respect of this disallowance, is also not leviable. The same is also, therefore, quashed.” 2.In the above view of the matter, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan