In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. M/S.industrial Agencies Corporation (New Mumbai, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 23[rd] January 2013 P.C. : 1.In all these appeals by the Revenue, the basic dispute is whether the amount received by the respondent – assessee as rent and service tax is to be taxed under the head income from business or income from house property.
Decision: Accordingly, all the three appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1043 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusIndage Wines..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1129 OF 2011
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Industrial Agencies Corporation (New Mumbai)..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 23[rd] January 2013
P.C. :
1.In all these appeals by the Revenue, the basic dispute is whether
the amount received by the respondent – assessee as rent and service tax is to be taxed under the head income from business or income from house property.
2.We find that in all these appeals, the Tribunal has remanded the issue to the assessing officer to examine the agreements entered into by the assessee and decide the issue in accordance with law.
3.In view of the fact that the matters are remanded for fresh decision to the assessing officer, we see no reason to entertain the appeals. Accordingly, all the three appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.