The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. Shri Thakershi H. Gala
High Court
21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. Shri Thakershi H. Gala
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai v. Shri Thakershi H. Gala, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.810 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai ..Appellant.VersusShri Thakershi H. Gala..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.811 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, Mumbai ..Appellant.VersusSmt.Neeta S. Gala..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to be raised in these appeals revolve around deletion of additions made on account of alleged unaccounted income from sale of jewellery declared under VDIS. The learned counsel for the revenue submits that the certificate issued under VDIS Scheme has not been cancelled. He further submits that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court decided on 2-7-2009in the case of CIT, Thane V/s. Dinesh P.Karia (lead case being Income Tax Appeal No.547/2009).
2.In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the revenue, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in these appeals. The appeals are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.