The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 18, Mumbai v. Superstar International
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 18, Mumbai v. Superstar International
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 18, Mumbai v. Superstar International, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1227 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax - 18, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Superstar International
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.K.R. Chaudhari for the appellant.Ms.Usha Dalal for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Since the quantum appeal has already been dismissed by an order dated 4-12-2007 passed in Notice of Motion No.3569 of 2006 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2046 of 2006, we do not found any substance in the questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal, wherein deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is the subject matter of challenge. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue