Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18 v. G...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18 v. Gautam Hiralal Gandhi

High Court 07 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18 v. Gautam Hiralal Gandhi
Date of order
07 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18 v. Gautam Hiralal Gandhi, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 948 OF 2011 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 949 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 18 Vs.Gautam Hiralal Gandhi .. Appellant .. Respondent. Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the Appellant.Mr. Prakash Shah with Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for the Respondent. CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. 1Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this Appeal. 2In the present case, the Assessee had claimed special deduction under chapter VIA of the Act by disclaiming depreciation. In view of the conflicting decision prevailing at the material time, no fault could be found with the Assessee in disclaiming depreciation. Therefore, in the facts of the present case, the decision of the ITAT in holding that the Assessee has not concealed or furnished inaccurate particulars of income and consequently Section 271 (1)(c) is not attracted cannot be faulted. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan