Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Mrs...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah

High Court 08 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah
Date of order
08 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.13 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18: Appellant v/s Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah : Respondent Mr. K.R. Choudhari advocate for AppellantMr. J. Singh i/b K. Gopal Advocate for respondent Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan S.J. Kathawalla, JJ. Date : 8.8.2008 P.C..Heard learned counsel for the appellant. and dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded as per rules. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan