In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.13 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18: Appellant
v/s
Mrs. Kalpana Ramesh Shah
: Respondent
Mr. K.R. Choudhari advocate for AppellantMr. J. Singh i/b K. Gopal Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
S.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 8.8.2008
P.C..Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
and dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be
refunded as per rules.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.