The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18 v. Mrs.preeti Dolwani
High Court
07 May 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18 v. Mrs.preeti Dolwani
Date of order
07 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 18 v. Mrs.preeti Dolwani, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTIOIN NO.1154 OF 2011WITHREVIEW PETITION (L) NO.38 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5903 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18VersusMrs.Preeti Dolwani
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mrs.P S Cardozo for the appellant.Mr.Prakash Shah i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 7[th] May 2012
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of 513
days delay in filing the Review Petition. The Review Petition is taken out seeking review of the order passed on 14[th] October 2009, whereby the appeal filed by the Revenue has been dismissed.
2.The reasons for the delay set out in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion is that considerable time was taken in obtaining the approval for filing the Review Petition and getting the Review Petition
drafted. In every case, the approval for filing appeal / review is required to be obtained and the appeal / review is required to be got drafted and filed within the time stipulated. In the absence of any specific reason for the inordinate delay, we see no reason to condone the delay of 513 days in filing the Review Petition.
3.In this view of the matter, the Notice of Motion is dismissed with no order as to costs.
4.In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the Review Petition be consigned to the records.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue