Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S H.s.engineering & Marketing Services

High Court 07 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S H.s.engineering & Marketing Services
Date of order
07 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S H.s.engineering & Marketing Services, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is devoid of merits and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18.... Appellant vs M/s H.S.Engineering & Marketing Services .. Respondents ... Mr.A.R.Malhotra for Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for Respondents CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ. DATE :- 7th March,2014 PC: 1.Having heard Mr.Malhotra appearing on behalf of the Appellant, we find that the approach of the Tribunal in setting aside the penalty because the issue raised for consideration was debatable does not require any interference by us. Such factual position being admitted, there could not have been any penalty. The findings that are concurrently rendered do not give rise to any substantial questions of law. The Appeal is devoid of merits and is dismissed. (G.S.KULKARNI J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan