The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S. K.k. C. )........ Respondant
High Court
16 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S. K.k. C. )........ Respondant
Date of order
16 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S. K.k. C. )........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both theNotice of Motion and Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1824 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1221 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income tax-18 ).......Appellant
versus
M/s. K.K. C. )........ Respondant.
Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b Mr. R.G. Bhat for the Appellant
Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 16TH JULY 2008.
P.C.:
1.This is an application for condonation of delay of 213days in filing the present appeal. In the application hardly anyreasons much less substantial cause has been made out forcondonation of delay. The non-applicant has brought to ournotice a judgment of another Division Bench of this court inNotice of Motion No. 1709 of 2008 in Income Tax Appeal (L)No.1219 of 2008, wherein delay of 213 days was caused whichwas not condoned and the Notice of Motion and appeal involvingsame question was also dismissed.
We have no reason to take a view different than the
one taken by the Division Bench in M/s. K.K.C. Case (supra).Following the same view, we dismiss the Notice of Motion No.1815/08 while declining to condone the delay in filing the appeal.As a result of dismissal of Notice of Motion, the appeal does notsurvive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed. Both theNotice of Motion and Appeal stands dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.