Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. M/S S.k.koticha & Co

High Court 14 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Feb 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. M/S S.k.koticha & Co, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONI.T.X.A.L.1192/2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax -18 Vs. M/s S.K.Koticha & Co. Appellant Respondents Mr.D.K.Kamwal for AppellantMr.J.D.Mistry a/w Mr.A.K.Jasani for Respondent P.C. CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -14TH FEBRUARY,2011 .Counsel for the appellant states that since the appeal filed by the revenue against the order of ITAT canceling the order of CIT u/s 263 of the Act being I.T.X.A.1071/2010 is dismissed by this Court today the present appeal does not survive . Accordingly this appeal is dismissed. No costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.