In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.furn Arts, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1605 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1605 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Furn Arts .. Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees
be refunded to the Appellant as per Rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue