Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.mayur Manufactur Co

High Court 29 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.mayur Manufactur Co
Date of order
29 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.mayur Manufactur Co, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.762 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18 Vs. ..Appellant. M/s.Mayur Manufactur Co...Respondent. .... Mr. D.K.Kamwal for the Appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri with Ms. Preeti Shukla for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. P.C. : 29 June 2010. By its impugned order the Tribunal has restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in the light of the judgment in the case ofTopman Exports v. ITO(ITA 5769/Mum/2006 dated 11 August 2009). By the judgment delivered today in the Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (ITA(L) 2887 of 2009), the view of the Tribunal in the case of Topman has been disapproved. In the circumstances, this appeal is disposed of, on the request of learned counsel for the Revenue and the assessee, by directing the Assessing Officer to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with law and, while passing fresh orders to have due regard to the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (supra). The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan