In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.miku Agencies, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ttm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.137 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18Vs.
.. Appellant
M/s.Miku Agencies
.. Respondent.
Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the appellantMs.Usha Dalal for the Respondent.
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2011.
P.C.
The counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the Revenue in the Assessee’s own case in Tax Appeal No.3159 of 2010 has
been dismissed by us today. For the reasons stated therein, present appeal is also dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(K.K. TATED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue