Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.miku Agencies

High Court 23 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Sep 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.miku Agencies, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.671 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18Vs. .. Appellant M/s.Miku Agencies .. Respondent Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the appellant Ms.Usha J. Dalal for the respondent CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 23[rd] SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. The counsel for the respondent states that similar question raised by the Revenue in the Assessee’s own case in Tax Appeal No.3159 of 2010 has been dismissed by this court on 9.9.2011. For the reasons stated therein, present appeal is also dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.