In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.r.r.hosiery, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2072 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4932 OF 2010
…
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18vs.M/s.R.R.Hosiery
...Applicant
...Respondent
…
Mr.A.R.Malhotra with Mr.N.A.Kazi for the Applicant.Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
...
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 12 DECEMBER 2014
P.C.
For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support and finding that rightly or wrongly the Registry has condoned the delay in complying with its conditional order and proceeded to register the Appeal, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue