The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.shanam Pharma
High Court
04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.shanam Pharma
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. M/S.shanam Pharma, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.455 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18....Appellant
vs.
M/s.Shanam Pharma....Respondent.
---
Mr.K.R.Choudhary, for Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 4[th] September,2008.
P.C.:-
1.There is clear finding recorded by theTribunal that the activities carried out by theassessee are manufacturing activities. The assesseeis also paying excise duties under the Excise Act
because the activities carried out by it aremanufacturing activities. The Tribunal has relied onits earlier judgment in the case “JCIT Vs. VaipaPharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd. in ITA No.3670/M/2000”. Thelearned Counsel appearing for appellant is not in aposition to point out that that judgment has beenchallenged by the Department. No question of lawarises. The appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.