The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Opera Clothing
High Court
05 Feb 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Opera Clothing
Date of order
05 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Opera Clothing, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In thecircumstances, the Appeal is allowed and the question of law is answered in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2860 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18
Vs.
Opera Clothing
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the Appellant.Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Respondent.
....
.....
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
5[th] February, 2010.
The office objections are waived. The registry is directed to number the Appeal.
Admit. The following substantial question of law is raised in the
Appeal by the revenue :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and inlaw Hon ble Tribunal erred is legally right in upholding the order’of the CIT(A) directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction u/s. 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of Income from Duty Draw Back of Rs.89,30,418/- and DEPB of Rs.71,48,930/- earned the Respondent -assessee?”
Counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue and counsel appearing
on behalf of the assessee are agreed in stating before the Court that the issue
which arises in the Appeal is covered against the assessee by the judgment of –the Supreme Court in Liberty India v. CIT (2009) 317 ITR 218(SC). In thecircumstances, the Appeal is allowed and the question of law is answered in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.