The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai v. Blue Diamond Construction Company
High Court
31 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai v. Blue Diamond Construction Company
Date of order
31 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai v. Blue Diamond Construction Company, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1406 OF 2010
INREVIEW PETITION (L) NO.50 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2174 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusBlue Diamond Construction Company..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Prakash Shah i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 31[st] March 2012
1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue