Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mrs. Meena S. Rambhia

High Court 12 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mrs. Meena S. Rambhia
Date of order
12 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mrs. Meena S. Rambhia, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6846 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19, Mumbai. Vs. Mrs. Meena S. Rambhia. ........ None for the Appellant. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. P.C. CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12th JANUARY, 2012. 1.None for the appellant. Even on the last occasion, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan