In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai v. Shri Manoj V. Meswani, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1509 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 19, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Manoj V. Meswani
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.Mr.P.S. Jetly for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue.
2.It was open for the revenue to take additional evidence on record having allowed to raise additional grounds, same was rightly appreciated by the tribunal. We find no substantial question of law in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue