Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 } v. I...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 } v. Itxa.1318.2012.11.Doc

High Court 19 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 } v. Itxa.1318.2012.11.Doc
Date of order
19 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 } v. Itxa.1318.2012.11.Doc, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: With this clarification, the Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1318 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19}AppellantversusM/s. all India Medical Corporation}Respondent Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant.Mr. Nishit Gandhi i/b. Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Respondent. CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED :-NOVEMBER 19, 2014 P.C. :- Having heard Mr. Ahuja, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, we find that what the Tribunal has done ultimately is nothing but restoration of the issue or question back to the Assessing Officer. Hence, we need not entertain this Appeal. In fact the direction ultimately issued and which is to be followed by the Assessing Officer is in the interest of the Revenue. We do not see how the Assessing Officer by mere observations of the Tribunal will decide the question or issue remitted back to him in favour of the Assessee necessarily. When such directions are issued, questions and matters are restored to the file Assessing Officer again, the Assessing Officer must deal with and decide it in accordance with law. Any observations of the Tribunal and in the given facts and circumstances are only to guide him and do not necessarily bind him. In these circumstances, the apprehension of Mr. Ahuja has no basis. With this clarification, the Appeal is dismissed. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan