Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Shr...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Shri Rabinder Krishan Nigam

High Court 30 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Shri Rabinder Krishan Nigam
Date of order
30 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Shri Rabinder Krishan Nigam, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19 … Appellant v/s Shri Rabinder Krishan Nigam … Respondent Mr.Arvind Pinto for the appellant. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 30TH APRIL, 2014`` P. C. : 1Having heard Mr.Pinto, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue and perusing the order passed on 27[th] April, 2011 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in relation to the respondent assessee and for the assessment year 2003-2004, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal did not commit any perversity nor is its order vitiated by any error of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal has set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 19[th] March, 2008 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Upon appreciation of all the materials, the Tribunal concluded that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has merely substituted his view and that in place of the Assessing Officer. Something more was required for the purposes of exercising powers under Section 263 of the Act. The Tribunal found that the order passed by the Assessing Officer is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. We would not entertain an appeal only to re-appreciate and re-appraise such findings. The appeal, therefore, does not raise any substantial question of law. It is accordingly dismissed. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan