Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Ver...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Versus

High Court 10 Apr 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Apr 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Versus, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 of 3 WP.2937.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2937 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19 Petitioner versus M/s.Long Bond Receivable Trust 2006Series IVRespondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2938 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19Petitioner versus M/s.Long Board Receivable Trust 2007Series V Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2939 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19PetitionerversusM/s.IGHCC2 Loan Trust Ltd.Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2940 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19Petitionerversus M/s.IRE Loan Trust Limited Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2941 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19Petitionerversus M/s.IGHCC3 Loan Trust Limited Respondent 2 of 3 WP.2937.2012 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2943 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19PetitionerversusM/s.IPGE Loan TrustRespondent WITHWRIT PETITION (L) NO.2944 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19PetitionerversusM/s.Long Board Receivable Trust 2006Series IIIRespondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2946 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19PetitionerversusM/s.KGE Loan Trust LimitedRespondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2947 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19PetitionerversusM/s.IFHCC Loan Trust LimitedRespondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for Petitioners.Mr.Madhur Agarwal with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for Respondents. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : 10 April 2013 3 of 3 WP.2937.2012 PC : 1.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous by the subsequent development which is that the Tribunal has already decided the appeal as a result of which the stay application did not survive and moreover, an order of assessment has also been passed by the Assessing Officer. 2.The petitions are accordingly dismissed as not pressed. In the circumstances, we clarify that we have had no occasion to render any adjudication on the questions raised in the proceedings. (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) MST (A.A.SAYED, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.