Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1Madurai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1Madurai v. Thiagarajar Mills Ltd.,Kappalur,Madurai-625 008

High Court 24 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1Madurai v. Thiagarajar Mills Ltd.,Kappalur,Madurai-625 008
Date of order
24 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1Madurai v. Thiagarajar Mills Ltd.,Kappalur,Madurai-625 008, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

TCA No.122 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.06.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No.122 of 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1Madurai. Appellant Vs Thiagarajar Mills Ltd.,Kappalur,Madurai-625 008. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai, dated 22.12.2010 in ITA No1494/Mds/2010. For Appellant:Mr.J.NarayanaswamySr. Standing CounselFor Respondent:Mr.A.S.Sriraman __________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Shri Narayanaswamy states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that he has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeal. 2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. 3. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 24.06.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nobbr __________ Page 2 of 4 To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 Madurai. Madurai. 3. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I, Madurai. Range-I, Madurai. __________ Page 3 of 4 __________ Page 4 of 4 TCA No.122 of 2012 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J. bbr TCA No.122 of 2012 24.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan