The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1,Mumbai v. M/S.frigerio Conserva Allana Ltd
High Court
08 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1,Mumbai v. M/S.frigerio Conserva Allana Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1,Mumbai v. M/S.frigerio Conserva Allana Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3202 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4939 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Mumbai )..AppellantVs.M/s.Frigerio Conserva Allana Ltd.,----
)..Respondents
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/by Joy Legal for the respondents.----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 8/2/2011.
PC
1By consent, Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clauses-(a) & (b). Motion disposed off.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4939 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Mumbai )..AppellantVs.M/s.Frigerio Conserva Allana Ltd., )..Respondents----
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/by Joy Legal for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 8/2/2011.
PC
1Not on board. By consent taken up for admission.
2Counsel on both the parties state that question framed in this matter is covered against the Revenue by the decision of the Apex
Court in the case of CIT Vs.Tulsyan NEC Ltd., reported in [2011] 330 ITR 226 (SC). In this view of the matter, Appeal is dismissed.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.